Almonds vs Chuhara
Per 100 g, Almonds has 608 kcal and 18.3 g protein, while Chuhara has 319 kcal and 2.5 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Almonds | Chuhara | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 608 kcal | 319 kcal better | 48% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 18.3 g better | 2.5 g | 86% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.3 g better | 75 g | 96% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 58.3 g | 0.6 g better | 99% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 13.3 g better | 8.8 g | 34% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2.5 g better | 66.9 g | 96% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Chuhara
Chuhara is the lighter choice at 319 kcal per 100 g against 608 for Almonds — about 48% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Almonds a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Almonds
Almonds is the stronger protein source, with 18.3 g per 100 g against 2.5 g for Chuhara. To match that from Chuhara you would have to eat roughly 7.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Almonds vs Chuhara — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.