Almonds vs Dried Apricot
Per 100 g, Almonds has 608 kcal and 18.3 g protein, while Dried Apricot has 317 kcal and 3.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Almonds | Dried Apricot | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 608 kcal | 317 kcal better | 48% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 18.3 g better | 3.3 g | 82% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.3 g better | 72.7 g | 96% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 58.3 g | 0.7 g better | 99% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 13.3 g better | 3.3 g | 75% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2.5 g better | 25.7 g | 90% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Dried Apricot
Dried Apricot is the lighter choice at 317 kcal per 100 g against 608 for Almonds — about 48% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Almonds a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Almonds
Almonds is the stronger protein source, with 18.3 g per 100 g against 3.3 g for Dried Apricot. To match that from Dried Apricot you would have to eat roughly 5.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Almonds vs Dried Apricot — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.