Almonds vs Pistachios
Per 100 g, Almonds has 608 kcal and 18.3 g protein, while Pistachios has 540 kcal and 23.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Almonds | Pistachios | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 608 kcal | 540 kcal better | 11% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 18.3 g | 23.3 g better | 22% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.3 g better | 15.7 g | 79% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 58.3 g | 42.3 g better | 27% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 13.3 g better | 10.7 g | 20% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2.5 g better | 8 g | 69% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Pistachios
Pistachios is the lighter choice at 540 kcal per 100 g against 608 for Almonds — about 11% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Almonds a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Pistachios
Pistachios is the stronger protein source, with 23.3 g per 100 g against 18.3 g for Almonds. To match that from Almonds you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Almonds vs Pistachios — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.