Aloo Matar vs Sweet Corn
Per 100 g, Aloo Matar has 101 kcal and 3.5 g protein, while Sweet Corn has 97 kcal and 4.1 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Aloo Matar | Sweet Corn | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 101 kcal | 97 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 3.5 g | 4.1 g better | 15% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 9.7 g better | 16.4 g | 41% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 5.1 g | 1.3 g better | 75% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 3.6 g better | 3.3 g | 8% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.9 g better | 4.7 g | 60% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Aloo Matar and Sweet Corn land within a few percent of each other on calories (101 vs 97 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Aloo Matar carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Sweet Corn
Sweet Corn is the stronger protein source, with 4.1 g per 100 g against 3.5 g for Aloo Matar. To match that from Aloo Matar you would have to eat roughly 1.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Aloo Matar vs Sweet Corn — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.