Aloo Matar vs Tapioca
Per 100 g, Aloo Matar has 101 kcal and 3.5 g protein, while Tapioca has 80 kcal and 1 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Aloo Matar | Tapioca | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 101 kcal | 80 kcal better | 21% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 3.5 g better | 1 g | 71% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 9.7 g better | 17.8 g | 46% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 5.1 g | 0.2 g better | 96% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 3.6 g | 4.6 g better | 22% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.9 g better | 2.1 g | 10% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Tapioca
Tapioca is the lighter choice at 80 kcal per 100 g against 101 for Aloo Matar — about 21% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Aloo Matar a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Aloo Matar
Aloo Matar is the stronger protein source, with 3.5 g per 100 g against 1 g for Tapioca. To match that from Tapioca you would have to eat roughly 3.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Aloo Matar vs Tapioca — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.