Aloo Palak vs Bhutta
Per 100 g, Aloo Palak has 57 kcal and 1.6 g protein, while Bhutta has 120 kcal and 3.6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Aloo Palak | Bhutta | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 57 kcal better | 120 kcal | 52% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 1.6 g | 3.6 g better | 56% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 5.9 g better | 22.7 g | 74% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 2.8 g | 1.4 g better | 50% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.1 g | 3.7 g better | 43% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.9 g better | 1.5 g | 40% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Aloo Palak
Aloo Palak is the lighter choice at 57 kcal per 100 g against 120 for Bhutta — about 52% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Bhutta a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Bhutta
Bhutta is the stronger protein source, with 3.6 g per 100 g against 1.6 g for Aloo Palak. To match that from Aloo Palak you would have to eat roughly 2.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Aloo Palak vs Bhutta — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.