Aloo Palak vs Raw Papaya
Per 100 g, Aloo Palak has 57 kcal and 1.6 g protein, while Raw Papaya has 24 kcal and 0.5 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Aloo Palak | Raw Papaya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 57 kcal | 24 kcal better | 58% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 1.6 g better | 0.5 g | 69% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 5.9 g | 4.4 g better | 25% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 2.8 g | 0.2 g better | 93% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.1 g | 2.3 g better | 9% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.9 g better | 3.6 g | 75% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Raw Papaya
Raw Papaya is the lighter choice at 24 kcal per 100 g against 57 for Aloo Palak — about 58% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Aloo Palak a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Aloo Palak
Aloo Palak is the stronger protein source, with 1.6 g per 100 g against 0.5 g for Raw Papaya. To match that from Raw Papaya you would have to eat roughly 3.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Aloo Palak vs Raw Papaya — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.