Aloo Palak vs Zucchini
Per 100 g, Aloo Palak has 57 kcal and 1.6 g protein, while Zucchini has 19 kcal and 1.2 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Aloo Palak | Zucchini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 57 kcal | 19 kcal better | 67% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 1.6 g better | 1.2 g | 25% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 5.9 g | 2.3 g better | 61% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 2.8 g | 0.5 g better | 82% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.1 g | 2.1 g | about the same |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.9 g | 0.2 g better | 78% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Zucchini
Zucchini is the lighter choice at 19 kcal per 100 g against 57 for Aloo Palak — about 67% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Aloo Palak a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Aloo Palak
Aloo Palak is the stronger protein source, with 1.6 g per 100 g against 1.2 g for Zucchini. To match that from Zucchini you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Zucchini is more efficient per calorie (6.3 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2.8 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Aloo Palak vs Zucchini — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.