Amla vs Apple
Per 100 g, Amla has 23 kcal and 0.3 g protein, while Apple has 63 kcal and 0.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Amla | Apple | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 23 kcal better | 63 kcal | 63% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 0.3 g | 0.3 g | about the same |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 4.3 g better | 13.1 g | 67% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0 g better | 0.7 g | 100% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 7.7 g better | 2.6 g | 66% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 3.3 g better | 9.5 g | 65% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Amla
Amla is the lighter choice at 23 kcal per 100 g against 63 for Apple — about 63% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Apple a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Amla
Both carry a similar amount of protein (0.3 g and 0.3 g per 100 g), so Amla takes it on the calorie cost — 1.3 g of protein per 100 kcal against 0.5 g. You get the same protein for less of your daily budget.
Amla vs Apple — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.