Apple vs Fig
Per 100 g, Apple has 63 kcal and 0.3 g protein, while Fig has 82 kcal and 2 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Apple | Fig | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 63 kcal better | 82 kcal | 24% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 0.3 g | 2 g better | 85% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 13.1 g better | 16.2 g | 19% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.7 g | 0.4 g better | 43% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.6 g | 4.6 g better | 44% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 9.5 g | 8.6 g better | 10% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Apple
Apple is the lighter choice at 63 kcal per 100 g against 82 for Fig — about 24% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Fig a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Fig
Fig is the stronger protein source, with 2 g per 100 g against 0.3 g for Apple. To match that from Apple you would have to eat roughly 6.7 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Apple vs Fig — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.