Apple vs Tamarind
Per 100 g, Apple has 63 kcal and 0.3 g protein, while Tamarind has 287 kcal and 2.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Apple | Tamarind | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 63 kcal better | 287 kcal | 78% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 0.3 g | 2.7 g better | 89% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 13.1 g better | 67.3 g | 81% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.7 g | 0 g better | 100% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.6 g | 5.3 g better | 51% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 9.5 g better | 52.7 g | 82% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Apple
Apple is the lighter choice at 63 kcal per 100 g against 287 for Tamarind — about 78% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Tamarind a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Tamarind
Tamarind is the stronger protein source, with 2.7 g per 100 g against 0.3 g for Apple. To match that from Apple you would have to eat roughly 9 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Apple vs Tamarind — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.