Avocado vs Wood Apple
Per 100 g, Avocado has 145 kcal and 2.9 g protein, while Wood Apple has 78 kcal and 3.1 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Avocado | Wood Apple | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 145 kcal | 78 kcal better | 46% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 2.9 g | 3.1 g better | 7% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 1.7 g better | 7.5 g | 77% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 13.9 g | 3.6 g better | 74% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 6.7 g better | 5.2 g | 22% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.7 g better | 3.8 g | 55% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Wood Apple
Wood Apple is the lighter choice at 78 kcal per 100 g against 145 for Avocado — about 46% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Avocado a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Wood Apple
Wood Apple is the stronger protein source, with 3.1 g per 100 g against 2.9 g for Avocado. To match that from Avocado you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Avocado vs Wood Apple — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.