Bathua vs Kundru
Per 100 g, Bathua has 28 kcal and 2.5 g protein, while Kundru has 18 kcal and 1.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Bathua | Kundru | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 28 kcal | 18 kcal better | 36% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 2.5 g better | 1.3 g | 48% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 2.6 g | 2.2 g better | 15% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.4 g | 0.2 g better | 50% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 4 g better | 3.1 g | 23% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.5 g better | 1 g | 50% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Kundru
Kundru is the lighter choice at 18 kcal per 100 g against 28 for Bathua — about 36% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Bathua a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Bathua
Bathua is the stronger protein source, with 2.5 g per 100 g against 1.3 g for Kundru. To match that from Kundru you would have to eat roughly 1.9 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Bathua vs Kundru — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.