Besan Barfi vs Rasgulla
Per 100 g, Besan Barfi has 423 kcal and 11.3 g protein, while Rasgulla has 118 kcal and 1.4 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Besan Barfi | Rasgulla | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 423 kcal | 118 kcal better | 72% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 11.3 g better | 1.4 g | 88% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 46.7 g | 25.8 g better | 45% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 22.3 g | 1.8 g better | 92% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 3.3 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 28.3 g | 25.4 g better | 10% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Rasgulla
Rasgulla is the lighter choice at 118 kcal per 100 g against 423 for Besan Barfi — about 72% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Besan Barfi a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Besan Barfi
Besan Barfi is the stronger protein source, with 11.3 g per 100 g against 1.4 g for Rasgulla. To match that from Rasgulla you would have to eat roughly 8.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Besan Barfi vs Rasgulla — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.