Cashews vs Pine Nuts
Per 100 g, Cashews has 580 kcal and 18.7 g protein, while Pine Nuts has 593 kcal and 12.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Cashews | Pine Nuts | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 580 kcal | 593 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 18.7 g better | 12.7 g | 32% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 25.3 g better | 26.7 g | 5% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 45.3 g better | 48.7 g | 7% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 4 g better | 3.7 g | 8% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 3.3 g better | 4.7 g | 30% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Cashews and Pine Nuts land within a few percent of each other on calories (580 vs 593 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Cashews carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Cashews
Cashews is the stronger protein source, with 18.7 g per 100 g against 12.7 g for Pine Nuts. To match that from Pine Nuts you would have to eat roughly 1.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Cashews vs Pine Nuts — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.