Cashews vs Supari
Per 100 g, Cashews has 580 kcal and 18.7 g protein, while Supari has 360 kcal and 6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Cashews | Supari | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 580 kcal | 360 kcal better | 38% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 18.7 g better | 6 g | 68% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 25.3 g better | 70 g | 64% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 45.3 g | 4 g better | 91% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 4 g | 12 g better | 67% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 3.3 g | 2 g better | 39% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Supari
Supari is the lighter choice at 360 kcal per 100 g against 580 for Cashews — about 38% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Cashews a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Cashews
Cashews is the stronger protein source, with 18.7 g per 100 g against 6 g for Supari. To match that from Supari you would have to eat roughly 3.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Cashews vs Supari — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.