Chana Masala vs Paneer
Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Paneer has 265 kcal and 18.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chana Masala | Paneer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 120 kcal better | 265 kcal | 55% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6 g | 18.3 g better | 67% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 18 g | 1.2 g better | 93% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3 g better | 20.8 g | 86% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 5 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 0 g better | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Chana Masala
Chana Masala is the lighter choice at 120 kcal per 100 g against 265 for Paneer — about 55% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Paneer a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Paneer
Paneer is the stronger protein source, with 18.3 g per 100 g against 6 g for Chana Masala. To match that from Chana Masala you would have to eat roughly 3.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chana Masala vs Paneer — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.