Chaulai vs Kundru
Per 100 g, Chaulai has 31 kcal and 3.3 g protein, while Kundru has 18 kcal and 1.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chaulai | Kundru | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 31 kcal | 18 kcal better | 42% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 3.3 g better | 1.3 g | 61% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 2.3 g | 2.2 g | about the same |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.7 g | 0.2 g better | 71% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 4.4 g better | 3.1 g | 30% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.3 g better | 1 g | 70% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Kundru
Kundru is the lighter choice at 18 kcal per 100 g against 31 for Chaulai — about 42% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chaulai a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chaulai
Chaulai is the stronger protein source, with 3.3 g per 100 g against 1.3 g for Kundru. To match that from Kundru you would have to eat roughly 2.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chaulai vs Kundru — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.