Chicken Korma vs Gushtaba
Per 100 g, Chicken Korma has 148 kcal and 9.8 g protein, while Gushtaba has 97 kcal and 6.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chicken Korma | Gushtaba | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 148 kcal | 97 kcal better | 34% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 9.8 g better | 6.3 g | 36% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 5.4 g | 3.1 g better | 43% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 9.7 g | 6.8 g better | 30% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.8 g better | 0.6 g | 67% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 3.3 g | 2.1 g better | 36% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Gushtaba
Gushtaba is the lighter choice at 97 kcal per 100 g against 148 for Chicken Korma — about 34% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chicken Korma a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chicken Korma
Chicken Korma is the stronger protein source, with 9.8 g per 100 g against 6.3 g for Gushtaba. To match that from Gushtaba you would have to eat roughly 1.6 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chicken Korma vs Gushtaba — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.