Chikoo vs Jamun
Per 100 g, Chikoo has 73 kcal and 0.9 g protein, while Jamun has 54 kcal and 0.9 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chikoo | Jamun | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 73 kcal | 54 kcal better | 26% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | about the same |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 13.9 g | 10.6 g better | 24% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 1.3 g | 0.6 g better | 54% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 9.6 g better | 4.3 g | 55% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 12.3 g | 7.6 g better | 38% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Jamun
Jamun is the lighter choice at 54 kcal per 100 g against 73 for Chikoo — about 26% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chikoo a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Jamun
Both carry a similar amount of protein (0.9 g and 0.9 g per 100 g), so Jamun takes it on the calorie cost — 1.7 g of protein per 100 kcal against 1.2 g. You get the same protein for less of your daily budget.
Chikoo vs Jamun — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.