Chuhara vs Peanuts
Per 100 g, Chuhara has 319 kcal and 2.5 g protein, while Peanuts has 520 kcal and 23.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chuhara | Peanuts | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 319 kcal better | 520 kcal | 39% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 2.5 g | 23.7 g better | 90% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 75 g | 17.3 g better | 77% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.6 g better | 39.7 g | 99% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 8.8 g | 10.3 g better | 15% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 66.9 g | 4.3 g better | 94% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Chuhara
Chuhara is the lighter choice at 319 kcal per 100 g against 520 for Peanuts — about 39% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Peanuts a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Peanuts
Peanuts is the stronger protein source, with 23.7 g per 100 g against 2.5 g for Chuhara. To match that from Chuhara you would have to eat roughly 9.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chuhara vs Peanuts — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.