Dalma vs Lobia
Per 100 g, Dalma has 119 kcal and 4.9 g protein, while Lobia has 320 kcal and 20.4 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Dalma | Lobia | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 119 kcal better | 320 kcal | 63% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 4.9 g | 20.4 g better | 76% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 15.1 g better | 54.6 g | 72% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 4.6 g | 1.1 g better | 76% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.1 g | 11.5 g better | 82% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 3.1 g | 1.6 g better | 48% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Dalma
Dalma is the lighter choice at 119 kcal per 100 g against 320 for Lobia — about 63% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Lobia a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Lobia
Lobia is the stronger protein source, with 20.4 g per 100 g against 4.9 g for Dalma. To match that from Dalma you would have to eat roughly 4.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Dalma vs Lobia — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.