Dates vs Dried Apricot
Per 100 g, Dates has 313 kcal and 2.5 g protein, while Dried Apricot has 317 kcal and 3.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Dates | Dried Apricot | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 313 kcal | 317 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 2.5 g | 3.3 g better | 24% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 72.5 g | 72.7 g | about the same |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.6 g better | 0.7 g | 14% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 9.4 g better | 3.3 g | 65% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 68.8 g | 25.7 g better | 63% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Dates and Dried Apricot land within a few percent of each other on calories (313 vs 317 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Dates carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Dried Apricot
Dried Apricot is the stronger protein source, with 3.3 g per 100 g against 2.5 g for Dates. To match that from Dates you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Dates vs Dried Apricot — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.