Lobia vs Masoor Dal
Per 100 g, Lobia has 320 kcal and 20.4 g protein, while Masoor Dal has 54 kcal and 2.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Lobia | Masoor Dal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 320 kcal | 54 kcal better | 83% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 20.4 g better | 2.3 g | 89% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 54.6 g | 5.4 g better | 90% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 1.1 g better | 2.5 g | 56% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 11.5 g better | 2 g | 83% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.6 g | 0.7 g better | 56% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Masoor Dal
Masoor Dal is the lighter choice at 54 kcal per 100 g against 320 for Lobia — about 83% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Lobia a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Lobia
Lobia is the stronger protein source, with 20.4 g per 100 g against 2.3 g for Masoor Dal. To match that from Masoor Dal you would have to eat roughly 8.9 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Lobia vs Masoor Dal — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.