Masala Dosa vs Sambar
Per 100 g, Masala Dosa has 165 kcal and 3.3 g protein, while Sambar has 97 kcal and 3.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Masala Dosa | Sambar | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 165 kcal | 97 kcal better | 41% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | about the same |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 19.6 g | 10.6 g better | 46% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 7.9 g | 4.4 g better | 44% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.5 g | 3.5 g better | 29% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.4 g better | 3.3 g | 58% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Sambar
Sambar is the lighter choice at 97 kcal per 100 g against 165 for Masala Dosa — about 41% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Masala Dosa a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Sambar
Both carry a similar amount of protein (3.3 g and 3.3 g per 100 g), so Sambar takes it on the calorie cost — 3.4 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2 g. You get the same protein for less of your daily budget.
Masala Dosa vs Sambar — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.