Matar Pulao vs Palak Khichdi
Per 100 g, Matar Pulao has 109 kcal and 3.9 g protein, while Palak Khichdi has 102 kcal and 3.5 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Matar Pulao | Palak Khichdi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 109 kcal | 102 kcal better | 6% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 3.9 g better | 3.5 g | 10% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 18.4 g | 17.4 g better | 5% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 1.9 g | 1.9 g | about the same |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 3.2 g better | 1.6 g | 50% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.3 g | 0.2 g better | 85% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Palak Khichdi
Palak Khichdi is the lighter choice at 102 kcal per 100 g against 109 for Matar Pulao — about 6% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Matar Pulao a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Matar Pulao
Matar Pulao is the stronger protein source, with 3.9 g per 100 g against 3.5 g for Palak Khichdi. To match that from Palak Khichdi you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Matar Pulao vs Palak Khichdi — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.