Murukku vs Paneer Puff
Per 100 g, Murukku has 595 kcal and 5.5 g protein, while Paneer Puff has 339 kcal and 7.6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Murukku | Paneer Puff | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 595 kcal | 339 kcal better | 43% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 5.5 g | 7.6 g better | 28% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 33.5 g | 22.8 g better | 32% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 48 g | 24 g better | 50% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2 g better | 1.1 g | 45% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0 g better | 4 g | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Paneer Puff
Paneer Puff is the lighter choice at 339 kcal per 100 g against 595 for Murukku — about 43% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Murukku a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Paneer Puff
Paneer Puff is the stronger protein source, with 7.6 g per 100 g against 5.5 g for Murukku. To match that from Murukku you would have to eat roughly 1.4 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Murukku vs Paneer Puff — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.