Oats vs Roti
Per 100 g, Oats has 375 kcal and 13.8 g protein, while Roti has 180 kcal and 6.8 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Oats | Roti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 375 kcal | 180 kcal better | 52% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 13.8 g better | 6.8 g | 51% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 67.5 g | 37.5 g better | 44% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 6.3 g | 1 g better | 84% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 10 g better | 5 g | 50% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2.5 g | 0.8 g better | 68% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Roti
Roti is the lighter choice at 180 kcal per 100 g against 375 for Oats — about 52% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Oats a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Oats
Oats is the stronger protein source, with 13.8 g per 100 g against 6.8 g for Roti. To match that from Roti you would have to eat roughly 2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Roti is more efficient per calorie (3.8 g of protein per 100 kcal against 3.7 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Oats vs Roti — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.