Afghani Chicken vs Mutton Korma
Per 100 g, Afghani Chicken has 151 kcal and 15.7 g protein, while Mutton Korma has 115 kcal and 7.1 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Afghani Chicken | Mutton Korma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 151 kcal | 115 kcal better | 24% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 15.7 g better | 7.1 g | 55% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 1.9 g better | 2.5 g | 24% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 9.1 g | 8.5 g better | 7% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.3 g | 0.8 g better | 63% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.8 g better | 1.7 g | 53% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Mutton Korma
Mutton Korma is the lighter choice at 115 kcal per 100 g against 151 for Afghani Chicken — about 24% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Afghani Chicken a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Afghani Chicken
Afghani Chicken is the stronger protein source, with 15.7 g per 100 g against 7.1 g for Mutton Korma. To match that from Mutton Korma you would have to eat roughly 2.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Afghani Chicken vs Mutton Korma — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.