Aloo Gobi vs Parwal
Per 100 g, Aloo Gobi has 80 kcal and 2 g protein, while Parwal has 24 kcal and 1.4 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Aloo Gobi | Parwal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 80 kcal | 24 kcal better | 70% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 2 g better | 1.4 g | 30% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 10 g | 3.5 g better | 65% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3.7 g | 0.3 g better | 92% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2 g | 2.6 g better | 23% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 0.4 g better | 80% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Parwal
Parwal is the lighter choice at 24 kcal per 100 g against 80 for Aloo Gobi — about 70% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Aloo Gobi a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Aloo Gobi
Aloo Gobi is the stronger protein source, with 2 g per 100 g against 1.4 g for Parwal. To match that from Parwal you would have to eat roughly 1.4 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Parwal is more efficient per calorie (5.8 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2.5 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Aloo Gobi vs Parwal — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.