Aloo Matar vs Matar ki Sabzi
Per 100 g, Aloo Matar has 101 kcal and 3.5 g protein, while Matar ki Sabzi has 103 kcal and 4.5 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Aloo Matar | Matar ki Sabzi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 101 kcal | 103 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 3.5 g | 4.5 g better | 22% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 9.7 g | 9.2 g better | 5% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 5.1 g | 5.1 g | about the same |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 3.6 g | 4.5 g better | 20% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.9 g better | 2 g | 5% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Aloo Matar and Matar ki Sabzi land within a few percent of each other on calories (101 vs 103 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Matar ki Sabzi carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Matar ki Sabzi
Matar ki Sabzi is the stronger protein source, with 4.5 g per 100 g against 3.5 g for Aloo Matar. To match that from Aloo Matar you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Aloo Matar vs Matar ki Sabzi — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.