Amla Murabba vs Chocolate Eclair

Per 100 g, Amla Murabba has 124 kcal and 0 g protein, while Chocolate Eclair has 240 kcal and 4.2 g protein.

Amla Murabba

124
kcal per 100 g
0 g protein

Chocolate Eclair

240
kcal per 100 g
4.2 g protein

Nutrition compared, per 100 g

Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient Amla Murabba Chocolate Eclair Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight 124 kcal better 240 kcal 48%
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle 0 g 4.2 g better 100%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets 32.4 g 26.2 g better 19%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density 0 g better 13.4 g 100%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion 0 g 0.4 g better 100%
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response 28.8 g 17.4 g better 40%
"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Amla Murabba

Amla Murabba is the lighter choice at 124 kcal per 100 g against 240 for Chocolate Eclair — about 48% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chocolate Eclair a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Chocolate Eclair

Chocolate Eclair is the stronger protein source, with 4.2 g per 100 g against 0 g for Amla Murabba. To match that from Amla Murabba you would have to eat roughly several times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Amla Murabba vs Chocolate Eclair — common questions

Chocolate Eclair has more calories — about 240 kcal per 100 g compared with 124 kcal for Amla Murabba.

Chocolate Eclair has more protein — 4.2 g per 100 g against 0 g for Amla Murabba.

Amla Murabba is the lighter choice at 124 kcal per 100 g against 240 for Chocolate Eclair — about 48% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chocolate Eclair a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Chocolate Eclair is the stronger protein source, with 4.2 g per 100 g against 0 g for Amla Murabba. To match that from Amla Murabba you would have to eat roughly several times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Yes. Combining them gives roughly 364 kcal and 4.2 g protein per 100 g of each. Indian meals are usually built from pairs like this, and mixing a grain with a protein source generally makes for a better-balanced plate than either on its own.

For most everyday goals Amla Murabba has the edge, mainly on calorie density. Per 100 g, Amla Murabba has 124 kcal and 0 g protein, while Chocolate Eclair has 240 kcal and 4.2 g protein. Healthy eating depends far more on total daily intake and portion size than on picking one of these two.

Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.

General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.