Apple vs Banana
Per 100 g, Apple has 63 kcal and 0.3 g protein, while Banana has 89 kcal and 1.1 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Apple | Banana | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 63 kcal better | 89 kcal | 30% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 0.3 g | 1.1 g better | 73% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 13.1 g better | 22.9 g | 43% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.7 g | 0.3 g better | 57% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.6 g | 2.6 g | about the same |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 9.5 g better | 11.9 g | 20% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Apple
Apple is the lighter choice at 63 kcal per 100 g against 89 for Banana — about 30% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Banana a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Banana
Banana is the stronger protein source, with 1.1 g per 100 g against 0.3 g for Apple. To match that from Apple you would have to eat roughly 3.7 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Apple vs Banana — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.