Apple vs Cherries
Per 100 g, Apple has 63 kcal and 0.3 g protein, while Cherries has 60 kcal and 1.5 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Apple | Cherries | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 63 kcal | 60 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 0.3 g | 1.5 g better | 80% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 13.1 g | 11.9 g better | 9% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.7 g | 0.5 g better | 29% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.6 g better | 2.1 g | 19% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 9.5 g better | 10.7 g | 11% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Apple and Cherries land within a few percent of each other on calories (63 vs 60 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Apple carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Cherries
Cherries is the stronger protein source, with 1.5 g per 100 g against 0.3 g for Apple. To match that from Apple you would have to eat roughly 5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Apple vs Cherries — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.