Atta Ladoo vs Swiss Roll

Per 100 g, Atta Ladoo has 391 kcal and 9.4 g protein, while Swiss Roll has 253 kcal and 7.3 g protein.

Atta Ladoo

391
kcal per 100 g
9.4 g protein

Swiss Roll

253
kcal per 100 g
7.3 g protein

Nutrition compared, per 100 g

Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient Atta Ladoo Swiss Roll Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight 391 kcal 253 kcal better 36%
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle 9.4 g better 7.3 g 22%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets 44.3 g better 48.3 g 8%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density 19.1 g 3.8 g better 80%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion 7.4 g better 0.5 g 93%
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response 16 g better 33 g 52%
"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Swiss Roll

Swiss Roll is the lighter choice at 253 kcal per 100 g against 391 for Atta Ladoo — about 36% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Atta Ladoo a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Atta Ladoo

Atta Ladoo is the stronger protein source, with 9.4 g per 100 g against 7.3 g for Swiss Roll. To match that from Swiss Roll you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Swiss Roll is more efficient per calorie (2.9 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2.4 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.

Atta Ladoo vs Swiss Roll — common questions

Atta Ladoo has more calories — about 391 kcal per 100 g compared with 253 kcal for Swiss Roll.

Atta Ladoo has more protein — 9.4 g per 100 g against 7.3 g for Swiss Roll.

Swiss Roll is the lighter choice at 253 kcal per 100 g against 391 for Atta Ladoo — about 36% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Atta Ladoo a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Atta Ladoo is the stronger protein source, with 9.4 g per 100 g against 7.3 g for Swiss Roll. To match that from Swiss Roll you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Swiss Roll is more efficient per calorie (2.9 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2.4 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.

Yes. Combining them gives roughly 644 kcal and 16.7 g protein per 100 g of each. Indian meals are usually built from pairs like this, and mixing a grain with a protein source generally makes for a better-balanced plate than either on its own.

For most everyday goals Swiss Roll has the edge, mainly on calorie density. Per 100 g, Atta Ladoo has 391 kcal and 9.4 g protein, while Swiss Roll has 253 kcal and 7.3 g protein. Healthy eating depends far more on total daily intake and portion size than on picking one of these two.
Full Atta Ladoo nutrition & serving sizes
Full Swiss Roll nutrition & serving sizes

Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.

General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.