Baked Fish vs Chana Masala
Per 100 g, Baked Fish has 114 kcal and 8.7 g protein, while Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Baked Fish | Chana Masala | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 114 kcal better | 120 kcal | 5% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 8.7 g better | 6 g | 31% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 4.1 g better | 18 g | 77% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 7 g | 3 g better | 57% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.1 g | 5 g better | 98% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 3.2 g | 2 g better | 38% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Baked Fish
Baked Fish is the lighter choice at 114 kcal per 100 g against 120 for Chana Masala — about 5% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chana Masala a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Baked Fish
Baked Fish is the stronger protein source, with 8.7 g per 100 g against 6 g for Chana Masala. To match that from Chana Masala you would have to eat roughly 1.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Baked Fish vs Chana Masala — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.