Banana vs Fig
Per 100 g, Banana has 89 kcal and 1.1 g protein, while Fig has 82 kcal and 2 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Banana | Fig | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 89 kcal | 82 kcal better | 8% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 1.1 g | 2 g better | 45% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 22.9 g | 16.2 g better | 29% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.3 g better | 0.4 g | 25% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.6 g | 4.6 g better | 44% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 11.9 g | 8.6 g better | 28% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Fig
Fig is the lighter choice at 82 kcal per 100 g against 89 for Banana — about 8% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Banana a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Fig
Fig is the stronger protein source, with 2 g per 100 g against 1.1 g for Banana. To match that from Banana you would have to eat roughly 1.8 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Banana vs Fig — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.