Bangda vs Catla Fish
Per 100 g, Bangda has 101 kcal and 21.5 g protein, while Catla Fish has 94 kcal and 17.9 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Bangda | Catla Fish | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 101 kcal | 94 kcal better | 7% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 21.5 g better | 17.9 g | 17% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 1.5 g better | 2.1 g | 29% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
Which is better for weight loss?
Catla Fish
Catla Fish is the lighter choice at 94 kcal per 100 g against 101 for Bangda — about 7% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Bangda a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Bangda
Bangda is the stronger protein source, with 21.5 g per 100 g against 17.9 g for Catla Fish. To match that from Catla Fish you would have to eat roughly 1.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Bangda vs Catla Fish — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.