Bangda vs Rohu Fish
Per 100 g, Bangda has 101 kcal and 21.5 g protein, while Rohu Fish has 102 kcal and 19.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Bangda | Rohu Fish | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 101 kcal | 102 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 21.5 g better | 19.7 g | 8% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 1.5 g better | 2.4 g | 38% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Bangda and Rohu Fish land within a few percent of each other on calories (101 vs 102 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: they are close on both.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Bangda
Bangda is the stronger protein source, with 21.5 g per 100 g against 19.7 g for Rohu Fish. To match that from Rohu Fish you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Bangda vs Rohu Fish — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.