Basa vs Fish Curry
Per 100 g, Basa has 204 kcal and 17.1 g protein, while Fish Curry has 111 kcal and 8.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Basa | Fish Curry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 204 kcal | 111 kcal better | 46% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 17.1 g better | 8.7 g | 49% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 0 g better | 3.8 g | 100% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 16.8 g | 6.7 g better | 60% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 1.9 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0 g better | 2 g | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Fish Curry
Fish Curry is the lighter choice at 111 kcal per 100 g against 204 for Basa — about 46% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Basa a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Basa
Basa is the stronger protein source, with 17.1 g per 100 g against 8.7 g for Fish Curry. To match that from Fish Curry you would have to eat roughly 2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Basa vs Fish Curry — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.