Catfish vs Chana Masala
Per 100 g, Catfish has 124 kcal and 15.9 g protein, while Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Catfish | Chana Masala | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 124 kcal | 120 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 15.9 g better | 6 g | 62% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 0 g better | 18 g | 100% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 6.2 g | 3 g better | 52% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 5 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0 g better | 2 g | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Catfish and Chana Masala land within a few percent of each other on calories (124 vs 120 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Chana Masala carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Catfish
Catfish is the stronger protein source, with 15.9 g per 100 g against 6 g for Chana Masala. To match that from Chana Masala you would have to eat roughly 2.7 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Catfish vs Chana Masala — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.