Chicken Handi vs Gushtaba
Per 100 g, Chicken Handi has 166 kcal and 12.3 g protein, while Gushtaba has 97 kcal and 6.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chicken Handi | Gushtaba | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 166 kcal | 97 kcal better | 41% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 12.3 g better | 6.3 g | 49% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 1.5 g better | 3.1 g | 52% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 12.5 g | 6.8 g better | 46% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.7 g better | 0.6 g | 14% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.7 g better | 2.1 g | 67% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Gushtaba
Gushtaba is the lighter choice at 97 kcal per 100 g against 166 for Chicken Handi — about 41% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chicken Handi a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chicken Handi
Chicken Handi is the stronger protein source, with 12.3 g per 100 g against 6.3 g for Gushtaba. To match that from Gushtaba you would have to eat roughly 2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chicken Handi vs Gushtaba — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.