Chocolate Barfi vs Makhana Kheer
Per 100 g, Chocolate Barfi has 340 kcal and 13 g protein, while Makhana Kheer has 108 kcal and 3.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chocolate Barfi | Makhana Kheer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 340 kcal | 108 kcal better | 68% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 13 g better | 3.3 g | 75% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 33 g | 12.9 g better | 61% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 18 g | 5 g better | 72% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 0.1 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 32.3 g | 11.5 g better | 64% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Makhana Kheer
Makhana Kheer is the lighter choice at 108 kcal per 100 g against 340 for Chocolate Barfi — about 68% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chocolate Barfi a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chocolate Barfi
Chocolate Barfi is the stronger protein source, with 13 g per 100 g against 3.3 g for Makhana Kheer. To match that from Makhana Kheer you would have to eat roughly 3.9 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chocolate Barfi vs Makhana Kheer — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.