Chocolate Eclair vs Rasmalai
Per 100 g, Chocolate Eclair has 240 kcal and 4.2 g protein, while Rasmalai has 135 kcal and 1.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chocolate Eclair | Rasmalai | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 240 kcal | 135 kcal better | 44% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 4.2 g better | 1.7 g | 60% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 26.2 g better | 29.2 g | 10% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 13.4 g | 2.2 g better | 84% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.4 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 17.4 g better | 28.7 g | 39% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Rasmalai
Rasmalai is the lighter choice at 135 kcal per 100 g against 240 for Chocolate Eclair — about 44% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chocolate Eclair a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chocolate Eclair
Chocolate Eclair is the stronger protein source, with 4.2 g per 100 g against 1.7 g for Rasmalai. To match that from Rasmalai you would have to eat roughly 2.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chocolate Eclair vs Rasmalai — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.