Coconut Chutney vs Sambar

Per 100 g, Coconut Chutney has 266 kcal and 3.7 g protein, while Sambar has 97 kcal and 3.3 g protein.

Coconut Chutney

266
kcal per 100 g
3.7 g protein

Sambar

97
kcal per 100 g
3.3 g protein

Nutrition compared, per 100 g

Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient Coconut Chutney Sambar Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight 266 kcal 97 kcal better 64%
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle 3.7 g better 3.3 g 11%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets 8.3 g better 10.6 g 22%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density 25 g 4.4 g better 82%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion 6.7 g better 3.5 g 48%
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response 3.7 g 3.3 g better 11%
"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Sambar

Sambar is the lighter choice at 97 kcal per 100 g against 266 for Coconut Chutney — about 64% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Coconut Chutney a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Coconut Chutney

Coconut Chutney is the stronger protein source, with 3.7 g per 100 g against 3.3 g for Sambar. To match that from Sambar you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Sambar is more efficient per calorie (3.4 g of protein per 100 kcal against 1.4 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.

Coconut Chutney vs Sambar — common questions

Coconut Chutney has more calories — about 266 kcal per 100 g compared with 97 kcal for Sambar.

Coconut Chutney has more protein — 3.7 g per 100 g against 3.3 g for Sambar.

Sambar is the lighter choice at 97 kcal per 100 g against 266 for Coconut Chutney — about 64% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Coconut Chutney a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Coconut Chutney is the stronger protein source, with 3.7 g per 100 g against 3.3 g for Sambar. To match that from Sambar you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Sambar is more efficient per calorie (3.4 g of protein per 100 kcal against 1.4 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.

Yes. Combining them gives roughly 363 kcal and 7 g protein per 100 g of each. Indian meals are usually built from pairs like this, and mixing a grain with a protein source generally makes for a better-balanced plate than either on its own.

For most everyday goals Sambar has the edge, mainly on calorie density. Per 100 g, Coconut Chutney has 266 kcal and 3.7 g protein, while Sambar has 97 kcal and 3.3 g protein. Healthy eating depends far more on total daily intake and portion size than on picking one of these two.
Full Coconut Chutney nutrition & serving sizes
Full Sambar nutrition & serving sizes

Other comparisons

Coconut Chutney vs Dosa Coconut Chutney vs Idli Coconut Chutney vs Masala Dosa Coconut Chutney vs Rava Idli

Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.

General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.