Crab vs Fish Curry
Per 100 g, Crab has 68 kcal and 15.4 g protein, while Fish Curry has 111 kcal and 8.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Crab | Fish Curry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 68 kcal better | 111 kcal | 39% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 15.4 g better | 8.7 g | 44% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 0 g better | 3.8 g | 100% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.6 g better | 6.7 g | 91% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 1.9 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0 g better | 2 g | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Crab
Crab is the lighter choice at 68 kcal per 100 g against 111 for Fish Curry — about 39% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Fish Curry a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Crab
Crab is the stronger protein source, with 15.4 g per 100 g against 8.7 g for Fish Curry. To match that from Fish Curry you would have to eat roughly 1.8 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Crab vs Fish Curry — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.