Crab vs Lobster
Per 100 g, Crab has 68 kcal and 15.4 g protein, while Lobster has 90 kcal and 18.5 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Crab | Lobster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 68 kcal better | 90 kcal | 24% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 15.4 g | 18.5 g better | 17% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.6 g better | 0.8 g | 25% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0 g | 0 g | about the same |
Which is better for weight loss?
Crab
Crab is the lighter choice at 68 kcal per 100 g against 90 for Lobster — about 24% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Lobster a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Lobster
Lobster is the stronger protein source, with 18.5 g per 100 g against 15.4 g for Crab. To match that from Crab you would have to eat roughly 1.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Crab is more efficient per calorie (22.6 g of protein per 100 kcal against 20.6 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Crab vs Lobster — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.