Custard vs Makhana Kheer
Per 100 g, Custard has 109 kcal and 5 g protein, while Makhana Kheer has 108 kcal and 3.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Custard | Makhana Kheer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 109 kcal | 108 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 5 g better | 3.3 g | 34% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 11.2 g better | 12.9 g | 13% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 5.1 g | 5 g | about the same |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 0.1 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 11.1 g | 11.5 g | about the same |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Custard and Makhana Kheer land within a few percent of each other on calories (109 vs 108 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Makhana Kheer carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Custard
Custard is the stronger protein source, with 5 g per 100 g against 3.3 g for Makhana Kheer. To match that from Makhana Kheer you would have to eat roughly 1.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Custard vs Makhana Kheer — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.