Dalma vs Raw Urad Dal
Per 100 g, Dalma has 119 kcal and 4.9 g protein, while Raw Urad Dal has 324 kcal and 23.1 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Dalma | Raw Urad Dal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 119 kcal better | 324 kcal | 63% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 4.9 g | 23.1 g better | 79% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 15.1 g better | 51 g | 70% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 4.6 g | 1.7 g better | 63% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.1 g | 11.9 g better | 82% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 3.1 g | 0.8 g better | 74% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Dalma
Dalma is the lighter choice at 119 kcal per 100 g against 324 for Raw Urad Dal — about 63% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Raw Urad Dal a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Raw Urad Dal
Raw Urad Dal is the stronger protein source, with 23.1 g per 100 g against 4.9 g for Dalma. To match that from Dalma you would have to eat roughly 4.7 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Dalma vs Raw Urad Dal — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.