Dhokla vs Murmura
Per 100 g, Dhokla has 135 kcal and 6 g protein, while Murmura has 360 kcal and 7.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Dhokla | Murmura | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 135 kcal better | 360 kcal | 63% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6 g | 7.3 g better | 18% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 20 g better | 78 g | 74% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3.5 g | 1.3 g better | 63% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2 g | 2.7 g better | 26% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 3 g | 0.7 g better | 77% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Dhokla
Dhokla is the lighter choice at 135 kcal per 100 g against 360 for Murmura — about 63% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Murmura a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Murmura
Murmura is the stronger protein source, with 7.3 g per 100 g against 6 g for Dhokla. To match that from Dhokla you would have to eat roughly 1.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Dhokla is more efficient per calorie (4.4 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Dhokla vs Murmura — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.